SCoR Talk

News

Thursday, September 16, 2010, Issue 67

Consultant radiographers improve patient care

When radiographer consultant practitioners are introduced into clinical imaging departments, more patients are seen and a higher-quality service is provided at the same cost, an SoR study has found.

Drs Richard Price and Linda Miller researched two NHS trusts where the four-tier career progression framework – assistant practitioner, practitioner, advanced practitioner, and consultant – has been implemented. Departmental performance was found to have markedly improved following the filling of the consultant radiographer post.

Both sites – one in the north of England and one in the south – demonstrated an increase in throughput of patients, with the first reporting the number of examinations up from 125,304 to 147,886 over two years, an increase of 18%.

For fluroscopy examinations, there was a 24.8% increase in activity in the first year following the new structure. Lists were no longer cancelled because of holidays or sickness and, if required, the capacity was increased. As a result, patient waiting times substantially reduced.

The service ‘gold standard’ of the double reporting of barium enemas and breast screening was achieved, and appointments were being offered to patients at a wider and more convenient range of times.

The study also shows radiologists’ time is being used to greater effect and there is improved teamworking within the imaging service and across departments.

No negative impacts

The participants reported no negative impacts of the new staffing framework, although staff did acknowledge that the introduction of the consultant practitioner post takes 'a lot of time and effort'.

The study observed that 'The introduction and design of consultant practitioner posts remains an ad hoc process, driven either opportunistically, through highly talented individuals being in post and driving the development and approval process; or through service need, where the consultant grade is introduced in an attempt to resolve a service difficulty'.

The cost of introducing the consultant post was restricted to the individual’s salary, plus development and training. In both trusts, there was no additional funding to resource the post and start-up costs were found from the existing budgets.

“With the current world shortage of radiographers, radiologists and oncologists, and spiralling demand for clinical imaging services, the pressures on imaging departments are well recognised,” commented Professor Audrey Paterson, director of professional policy at the Society.

“As demand for imaging services grows and budgets tighten, consultant practitioner appointments have supported service delivery and innovation and freed-up radiologist’s time.”

The report’s evidence concludes by recommending a larger study which would investigate clinical imaging and radiotherapy linked with a cost/benefit analysis.

The report is available on the SoR's website. Click here to view.
 

Other stories in this issue…

Content tools

Printer-friendly version