In this section

In This Section

Radiation protection FAQs

IR(ME)R Incident notification to Care Quality Commission (England only)

Q. What happens if my department notifies the Care Quality Commission of an IR(ME)R incident?
A. The CQC provides detailed information on when to report an IRMER incident.

On this page you will find a link to an online incident report form. Once the form is submitted, you will receive an automatically generated email acknowledgement, including an IRMER notification reference number. This number has to be used in all subsequent dialogue with the CQC. You are advised to contact the CQC if you do not receive this confirmation email.

If you have any difficulties, please contact the IRMER desk on 020 7448 9039 or via email at [email protected].

An example of the normal sequence of events when a radiation incident (IR(ME)R) notification has been made to CQC (England):

  • CQC contacts the person who completed the form.
  • The CQC expects to hear how the organisation has learned from what went wrong together with details of remedial action taken with the aim of preventing similar incidents occurring in the future.
  • Although the lead role in progressing notifications is taken centrally by the IRMER team, their field assessor responsible for the organisation has access to the case and its progress and may become involved as appropriate.
  • The CQC may also sometimes arrange a more informal visit to a medical exposure provider to discuss notifications in general or seek assurances on a particular matter arising from a notification.
  • In rare circumstances, the CQC will receive a notification that they believe requires a detailed investigation onsite and the opportunity to discuss the incident face-to-face with relevant staff during a ‘reactive’ inspection.
  • When this process is complete, we will formally close the notification. This is done by letter to the chief executive of the organisation with a copy sent by email to the individual who submitted the notification. The letter makes mention that the notification has been closed on the assumption that any recommendations or remedial action have, or are being, followed through.

Pregnancy and occupational exposures

Q: Am I safe to continue working as a radiographer if I am pregnant?

A: There is an epidemiological research article (free of charge) in the British Journal of Cancer entitled: Bunch KJ, Muirhead CR, Draper GJ, Hunter N, Kendall GM, O'Hagan JA, Phillipson MA, Vincent TJ, Zhang W. Cancer in the offspring of female radiation workers: a record linkage study. British Journal of Cancer (2009), Volume 100, Issue 1, pages 213-218. available for download here.

Although the radiation worker subjects involved in this research study are from the nuclear, research and industry sectors (who tend to be classified radiation workers) and NOT in healthcare (NOT radiographers), the conclusion that there is no evidence of an increased risk of childhood cancer associated with maternal preconception radiation work is heartening. However, there does seem to be limited evidence of a weak association between maternal radiation exposure during pregnancy and childhood cancer in offspring. A similar study that did involve radiographers found NO such evidence of excess cancer in the radiographers' offspring - see Roman E, Doyle P, Ansell P, Bull D, Beral V (1996) Health of children born to medical radiographers.

Occup Environ Med 53: 73-79 Many female radiographers have contacted the Society & College of Radiographers to express concerns regarding anxieties of occupational radiation exposure during pregnancy which has prompted information about working whilst pregnant to be posted on the SoR website. The SCoR also wishes to report that a new publication entitled "Pregnancy and work in Diagnostic Imaging" from the British Institute of Radiology" (to which SCoR had input) will be available shortly.

HSE have produced a useful publication which is available here PDF
This should be read in conjunction with the SoR Pregnant staff handbook – available under the Health and Safety section of this website.

The International Committee of Radiological Protection (ICRP) has produced a very useful (and free) PowerPoint presentation relating to information surrounding exposure to ionising radiation and pregnancy (for staff and patients).PowerPoint

Interventional Radiology

Q: How do I manage my radiation exposure when I am involved in interventional procedures?

A: There is a very useful power-point presentation about avoiding radiation injuries in interventional radiology. Available at:

IR(ME)R – Non-Medical Referrers

Q: Within my Trust, my role is Lead Radiographer for radiation protection governance and compliance. I oversee compliance of the IR(ME)R procedures and local rules.  We have an organisational policy for non-medical referrers and none can refer without attending a radiation awareness presentation but I noticed in Synergy recently an advert for a course on IRMER for non-medical referrers being run by the Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR). The advert refers to an agreement between SCoR and other AHP bodies regarding the level of radiation protection training required - I would like to know what is involved in this training.

A:The published guidance (based on previous SoR guidance) entitled “Clinical Imaging Requests from Non-Medically Qualified Professionals” has been agreed by SCoR with the Royal College of Radiologists, the Royal College of Nursing, the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists, the General Chiropractic Council and the General Osteopathic Council and is available on the SoR website. Although it is not mandatory under IR(ME)R for referrers to receive formal training, clinical imaging departments are advised in this publication to ensure that non-medically qualified referrers have received appropriate 'training' which is documented in accordance with local clinical governance procedures. SCoR, as the professional body for radiography, believes it appropriate that it leads in the provision of such 'training' and has organised a study day for non-medical IR(ME)R referrers. Also see IR(ME)R section.
The following topic areas are covered during the study day:

  • IR(ME) Regulations overview including 'employers procedures';
  • Radiation interactions with tissues (radiobiology, etc);
  • Overview of relevant imaging modalities;
  • Protocols for referral including 'request card' and employer agreement;
  • Responsibilities of referrers regarding evaluation of resultant image.

Local Rules

Q: Is there any guidance on the essential content of Local Rules?

A:Yes. This is detailed in the publication L121 "Work with ionising radiation. Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017. Approved Code of Practice and guidance"

Essential content: Local rules must contain the following information:

  • The dose investigation level specified for the purposes of regulation 
  • Identification or summary of any contingency arrangements, indicating the reasonably forseeable accidents to which they relate
  • Name(s) of the appointed radiation protection supervisor(s) 
  • The identification and description of the area covered, with details of its designation 
  • An appropriate summary of the working instructions, including the written arrangements relating to non-classified persons entering or working in controlled areas

Q:  What about guidance on 'optional' content of Local Rules?

A:  Again, this is available in the same publication.

Optional content: Local rules may also contain a brief summary of the general arrangements of the following information:

  • Management and supervision of the work;
  • Testing and maintenance of engineering controls and design features, safety features and warning devices;
  • Radiation and contamination monitoring;
  • Examination and testing of radiation monitoring equipment;
  • Personal dosimetry;
  • Arrangements for pregnant and breast feeding staff.

Q: When is 'classification' of radiation staff appropriate?

A: Radiation employers (ie, employers who in the course of a trade, business or other undertaking carry out work with ionising radiation) are required, under IRR17, to designate as classified persons those employees who are aged 18 years or over and are likely to receive an effective dose in excess of 6mSv per year or an equivalent dose in excess of 15mSv per year for the lens of the eye or geater than 150 mSv per year for the skin or the extremities. (IRR regulation 21)

Where this is the case, employees will be informed that they have been classified and must be certified by a relevant doctor as fit for the work they are undertaking with ionising radiation

They must have their doses appropriately assessed and recorded. (IRR regulation 22).

Non-Radiography Staff exposing patients to ionising radiation

Q:Our hospital is thinking of allowing non-radiographers (Operating Department Practitioners – ODP) to use the fluoroscopy unit within the theatre – can this be allowed?

A:For the protection of patients, the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 (IR(ME)R) requires any IR(ME)R 'Operator' to undergo 'adequate education and training' to fulfil their (medical exposure) role – this would also go for the ODP that is mentioned.

To undertake education and training to act as an 'Operator' would be to have demonstrable recorded evidence which would satisfy Schedule 3 of the IR(ME)R. It is theoretically correct that any individual can be given education and training (that includes both theory and practical training) to be able to be 'entitled' by an IRMER Employer as an 'Operator' (this is still necessary for even doing the fluoroscopic tasks in theatre). Radiographers, by virtue of their undergraduate training, already have this demonstrable evidence of training.

The other issue is, before each fluoroscopy procedure (exposure) is undertaken, it must first be 'justified' by the IRMER Practitioner – therefore in the theatre, it must be clear who would be providing this justification. Justification is the responsibility of the IRMER 'Practitioner' and the training for this may be greater. Again, Radiographers (usually more senior), have this demonstrable evidence of training. If the 'Practitioner' is to be the Surgeon, then the IR(ME)R Employer must ensure that the surgeon has also received the education and  training necessary (to also satisfy Schedule 3 of IRMER) and will hold a record of those entitled to act as “Practitioner”.'
The  ODP could act as an 'Operator', alongside the 'Practitioner', but they must take legal responsibility for monitoring and minimising radiation dose to the patient (ie, keeping within DAP “best practice' levels etc). Both the ODP and the surgeon must be made aware that these are legal roles – on the statute books under the Health and Safety at Work Act – and, as such, must take responsibility for the exposure to the patient. An important point to consider is that the surgeon is normally 'busy' dealing with the clinical requirements of the patient in theatre and does not always have the time to think about the technical and dosimetric elements of the radiation exposure procedure and, as such, would perhaps not be fulfilling the legal requirements of the IR(ME)R Practitioner role – something to think about with this proposal.

Additionally, the other Regulations that also come into force in this theatre scenario are the Ionising Radiations Regulations (IRR) 2017, in terms of protecting the radiation exposure to the staff involved in the theatre session; the QA of the equipment being used and also in taking responsibility for the controlled and supervised areas – there is a need to have the adequate training to fulfil these Regulations too. Again, a Radiographer does by virtue of their undergraduate training and education.

Radiation Doses – assessment and recording

Q: This HEI is reviewing the radiography degree educational programme and one of the questions that had come up, from an admissions point of view, is if students still have to be 18 years old to go out on clinical placement.

Do you know of any reasons why radiography students cannot start at 17 years?

A: SCoR are not aware of any age restrictions for entry into radiography education programmes, there used to be with the old DCR but SCoR have not imposed any now.

Radiography students and radiographers are not being 'classified' as radiation workers under IRR 2017, but there may be some differences within different clinical departments from their Local Rules point of view, please check with each clinical placement site that they agree with you about sending under 18 year olds on clinical placement — the RPS/RPA for each department will be able to help.

IR(ME)R is only about patients and does not affect potential doses to students/staff.

Training Courses in Radiation Protection

Q:Where can I do a radiation protection training course?

A:  Radiation protection RPS (for IRR 2017) courses are available at:

Ionactive Consulting

Radman Associates

IRS Limited

Public Health England training courses

IR(ME)R courses

If you are employed by the NHS you may access free learning on the E-Learning for Healthcare website and there is an IR(ME)R module.

Sue Barlow (a radiographer) runs particular IR(ME)R courses in IR(ME)R Theory for DXA Operator and IR(ME)R Theory for Mini C Arm Training her e-mail address is [email protected]

M&K Update run an IR(ME)R one day course.


The International Committee of Radiological Protection (ICRP) has produced a very useful (and free) PowerPoint presentation relating to information surrounding exposure to ionising radiation in Interventional Radiology Power Point

Q: There are plans to introduce 'trained' Operating Departmental Practitioners (ODP’s) using the image intensifiers in a cardiology theatre instead of radiographers. Is this allowed?

A:  SCoR do know of other (registered) staff groups being trained to use image intensifiers, although in cardiac work they are static units. Mobile units potentially present a greater radiation hazard. We cannot prevent this, however, we do remind people that the person must be adequately trained as an 'Operator' under IR(ME)R.

There is an issue around who is the 'Practitioner' under IR(ME)R, ie, who provides the justification for the exposure. A radiographer by virtue of their qualifications and HCPC registration can do this. Many medics will claim that they are the IR(ME)R Practitioner, likewise they must be trained in this role. We make the observation that it is difficult to be operating on someone and monitor the radiation dose to the patient and all staff at the same time.

SCoR advises that the theatre staff should work with the radiography department to ensure that there is adequate back-up and advice available.

There are programmes that are looking at 'generic' working in cardiac catheter labs, but the system of supervision and availability of expert advice is fundamental to these developments. Also, the nurses or electro physiologists involved generally only take on the role of Operator as the cardiologist is the Practitioner.

Asymptomatic Screening using Ionising Radiation

Q: I have heard of people paying to get a x-rays/CT scans as part of an annual health check – is this not against the IR(ME)R regulations?

A: This is an important point that relates to the concept of asymptomatic screening or Individual Health Assessment.

The Department of Health has published a working party report entitled ‘Justification of Computed Tomography (CT) for Individual Health Assessment’.

The report recommends circumstances when it may be justified to use CT scanning on individuals with no symptoms and outside of national screening programmes.

The working party that produced the report was recruited by the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Physicians.

SCoR Director of Professional Policy Charlotte Beardmore welcomed the report.

She said: “The SCoR has been concerned about self-referral and life-style screening for some time. We welcome these recommendations which discourage scans on people who are unlikely to benefit and encourage clear care pathways.

"However, we believe that self-referral for diagnostic imaging outside a nationally regulated health screening programme is inappropriate and unnecessary.”

Radiation protection FAQs