Doc menu

List of tables

Table 1: Percentages of nurses agreeing with positively framed items regarding career progression during the period 2005-2006 (Ball and Pike, 2006)   

Table 2: Variations in the perceived implementation of AfC by English health region (Buchan and Evans, 2007)  

Table 3: Appeal outcomes for full time and part time diagnostic imaging staff   

Table 4: Common reasons why diagnostic and therapeutic respondents collectively felt that their AfC pay band was unfair   

Table 5: Diagnostic specialties in terms of career development opportunities and expectations   

Table 6: Comparison of frequency of career development opportunities offered at sites with or without the CPF   

Table 7: Appeal outcomes for full time and part time therapeutic staff   

Table 8: Common reasons why diagnostic and therapeutic respondents collectively felt that their AfC pay band was unfair   

Table 9: Therapeutic specialties in terms of career development opportunities and expectations   

Table 10: Comparison of frequency of career development opportunities offered at sites with or without the CPF   

Table 11: Key responses in terms of length of time qualified   
 

Search this document

Content tools

Accessibility controls

Text size

AA A

Colour