Doc menu

References

1. The College of Radiographers. Reporting by Radiographers: a Vision Paper. London: The College of Radiographers; 1997.

2. The College of Radiographers. Medical Image Interpretation and Clinical Reporting by Non-Radiologists: The Role of the Radiographer. London: The College of Radiographers; 2006.

3. Paterson A.  Role Development - Towards 2000: A Survey of Role Developments in Radiography  London: The College of Radiographers; 1995.

4. Price RC, Miller LR, Mellor F. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography. Radiography 2002; 8(4): 223-234.

5. Price RC, Le Masurier SB. Longitudinal changes in extended roles in radiography: A new perspective. Radiography 2007; 13(1): 18-29. 

6. University of Hertfordshire and The Institute for Employment Studies. Scope of Radiographic Practice 2008: A report compiled by the University of Hertfordshire in collaboration with the Institute for Employment Studies for the Society and College of Radiographers. The Society and College of Radiographers, 2008.

[https://www.sor.org/learning/document-library/scope-radiographic-practice-2008-report-compiled-university-hertfordshire-collaboration-institute] (accessed 29th January 2013)

7. The Society and College of Radiographers.  Scope of radiographic practice survey 2012.  London: The Society and College of Radiographers; 2012. [https://www.sor.org/learning/document-library/scope-radiographic-practice-survey-2012]  (accessed 29th January 2013)

8. Brealey S, Scally A, Hahn S et al. Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol 2005; 60(2): 232-241. 

9. Coleman L, Piper K. Radiographic interpretation of the appendicular skeleton: A comparison between casualty officers, nurse practitioners and radiographers. Radiography 2009; 15(3):196-202.

10. Judson EE, Nightingale JM. An evaluation of radiographer performed and interpreted barium swallows and meals. Clinical Radiology 2009; 64(8):807-814.

11. Moore RJ, Healey PR, Hughes ML, Mullan D. GI radiographer-led real time review of CT colonography – One year on. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, March 2012; Suppl. 1, 43(1): S3.

12. Henderson D, Gray WK, Booth L.  Assessment of a radiographer-led discharge system for minor injuries: a prospective audit over 2 years. Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ (April 25, 2012).

13. Buskov L, Abild A, Christensen A, Holm O, et al. Radiographers and trainee radiologists reporting accident radiographs: A comparative plain film-reading performance study. Clinical Radiology 2013; 68:(1))55-58.

14. Hardy M, Hutton J and Snaith B. Is a radiographer led immediate reporting service for emergency department referrals a cost effective initiative? Radiography 2013; 19(1): 23-27. 

15. Department of Health. The NHS Plan: A plan for investment, A plan for reform. London: HMSO; 2000.

16. Department of Health. Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. London: HMSO; 2010.

17. Department of Health. Improving outcomes: A Strategy for Cancer.  London: HMSO; 2011.  

18. The Royal College of Radiologists and the Society and College of Radiographers. Team working in clinical imaging.  London: The Royal College of Radiologists and the Society and College of Radiographers; 2012.

19. Snaith B, Hardy M. Radiographer abnormality detection schemes in the trauma environment – an assessment of current practice, Radiography 2008; 14(4):277-281.

20. http://www.e-lfh.org.uk/projects/image-interpretation (accessed 29th January 2013)

21. Keane D. The College of Radiographers William Stripp Memorial Lecture given at the United Kingdom Radiological Congress in 2011.

22. Culpan DG. Mitchell S. Hughes M. et al. Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: a comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists. Clinical Radiology 2002; 57(7): 604-607 

23. Leslie A, Lockyer H, Virgee JP. Who should be performing routine abdominal ultrasound? A prospective double blind study comparing the accuracy of radiologist and radiographer. Clinical Radiology  2000; 55 (8): 606-609. 

24. Hogg P, Holmes K . The interpretation of nuclear medicine data by non-medical health care professionals: Developments in the United Kingdom . Journal of Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging . 2000; 3: 77–85.

25. Sumkin JH, Klaman HM, Graham M et al. Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment. American Journal of Radiology 2003; 180: 253-256. 

26. Shaw NJ, Hendry M, Eden OB. Interobserver variation in the interpretation of chest x-rays. Scottish Medical Journal 1990; 35: 140-141. 

27. The College of Radiographers. Education and Career Framework for the Radiography Workforce. London: The College of Radiographers; 2013.

28. The College of Radiographers. The Scope of Practice. London: The College of Radiographers; 2009.

29. Alderson CJ, Hogg P. Advanced radiographic practice-the legal aspects. Radiography 2003; 9(4):305-314.

30. Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of Proficiency for Radiographers. London: Health and Care Professions Council; 2009.  http://www.hcpc-uk.org/publications/standards/index.asp?id=51 (accessed 29th January 2013)

31. Health and Care Professions Council. Standards of Competence, Conduct and Ethics. London: Health and Care Professions Council; 2008.   http://www.hcpc-uk.org/publications/standards/index.asp?id=38 (accessed 29th January 2013)

32. Health and Care Professions Council. Your Guide to our Standards for Continuing Professional Development. London: Health and Care Professions Council; 2011. http://www.hcpc-uk.org/publications/standards/index.asp?id=101 (accessed 29th January 2013)

33. https://www.sor.org/being-member/professional-indemnity-insurance/pii-guidance-members (accessed 29th January 2013) 

34. The College of Radiographers. Code of Conduct and Ethics. London: The College of Radiographers; 2008.

Content tools

Accessibility controls

Text size

AA A

Colour